In case anyone is wondering, the weird formatting is because I stopped paying for a "pro" account with Typepad. So I've got what they call "a microblog" for now, while I work on figuring out how to transfer everything to a new home.
In case anyone is wondering, the weird formatting is because I stopped paying for a "pro" account with Typepad. So I've got what they call "a microblog" for now, while I work on figuring out how to transfer everything to a new home.
I don't want to jinx us, and I certainly don't want to make light of the H1N1 flu, which has knocked several people of my acquaintance on their backsides, but so far this fall my family has been far less sick than in the average year. And it's not just me -- Fairfax county schools are reporting a 3.6 percent absenteeism rate, down from an average of 4.03 percent. My theory is that everyone is being so good about washing hands, and not coming to work/school when they're sick, that they're passing around a lot fewer colds than usual.
[For the record, we did get both boys vaccinated last weekend. The Fairfax health department mass clinic was amazingly efficient. Vaccines have not yet been available for non-priority populations in this area, so neither T. nor I have been vaccinated.]
I listened to the health care debate in Congress on and off today while driving around to soccer fields and the mass flu vaccination site, and for the last hour I've had c-span on while sorting my clothes. Although I know that there's still a long while to go before we actually get a law, and this bill is truly an act of sausage making, I'm still fascinated by the process.
Wow, the margin is a lot closer than I would have guessed-- they've got exactly the 218 votes needed, with only one D not yet recorded. I'll be interested to see how many of the Dems voting no are on the left.
Ok, here's the roll call results. I'm not an expert on all members of Congress, but the only nos that jump out at me as being from the left are Kucinich, and maybe Artur Davis.
So, the big news of the evening was probably the passage of the Stupak amendment, which says that any insurance plan purchased through the "exchange" can't cover abortion. My understanding is that this would NOT affect coverage under employer-provided insurance. When I looked into this last year, I found out that about half of employer-provided plans do cover abortions.
I think this is bad policy, for precisely the same reason that I think the Hyde amendment, which bans coverage of abortion under Medicaid, is bad policy. It pushes abortions into the second trimester, which is more dangerous and more expensive. But I'm not particularly surprised by it. Fundamentally, I'd rather health insurance reform that didn't cover abortion than no health insurance reform. And with such a thin margin, I'm not sure Pelosi had a choice.
The cynic in me wonders if maybe more of the public will holler when it's their insurance that is affected, not just poor women's coverage.
Update: I listened to this NPR story on the Stupak amendment on my way home tonight, and now I'm even more confused. They say that it doesn't prevent the exchange from including plans that cover abortion (although insurers would have to offer plans that were otherwise identical but didn't cover abortion) as long as you're paying with only your own money and don't receive a tax subsidy for the insurance.
So what I'm confused about is what are the rules for employer-provided insurance, which is also tax-subsidized. Is it covered by the Stupak amendment? Or are they pretending that employer-provided insurance isn't subsidized by taxpayers?
Update 2: Nice analysis of the D's who voted no from the NY Times.
I just finished Lev Grossman's The Magicians. Wow, this one was depressing. The content was depressing, but I was also depressed because I kept on waiting for the payoff for slogging through this, and it never came. I had heard a rave review of it on NPR, and at least one blogger I read loved it. (Sorry, can't find the link -- feel free to speak up to defend it.)
Cory Doctorow liked it, and says that it's a book of wonder without awe or sentimentality. I guess that's right. It's a scathing revisionist take on both Harry Potter and the Narnia books, (with some random references to The Once and Future King, and Dungeons and Dragons) imaging a magical school that is tedious and incomprehensible, and a journey through fantasy where people react realistically to being under attack for no obvious reason. Oh, and the characters drink and curse and have sex. The main character is miserable in his pre-magic live, miserable at school, and miserable when he gets to live out his fantasy. The epigram to the book is Prospero breaking his wand, but it should have been Hamlet's "there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so." I wanted to give him a kick in the pants for much of the book.
There were also major plot holes that irritated me. Why have the two main characters randomly promoted a year at school other than that the author had decided to make school last 5 years rather than 4, but were too lazy to come up with material to fill another year? Why spend a huge chunk of time telling how the main character survived naked in Antartica, and then have the characters obsess about whether to bring their parkas to Narnia/Fillory?


From Heather Boushey, The New Breadwinners, in The Shriver Report: A Woman's Nation Changes Everything, Maria Shriver and the Center for American Progress.
mom, policy wonk, idealist
Recent Comments